Lean launchpad and entrepreneurship

What is the Lean Launchpad?

The Lean Launchpad was developed by Steve Blank (serial entrepreneurs and adjunct professor at Stanford) and colleagues as a repeatable process to create a startup. It is probably the most popular methodology today, featuring in a great number of entrepreneurship programs for students and mature students. It is also the method used at Y-Combinator and other top incubator programs. Despite its popularity, there is little empirical research examining the method.

Assumptions behind the Lean Launchpad

The theory behind the Lean Launchpad can be described as a discovery theory. The entrepreneurship literature is divided about the nature of entrepreneurial opportunities. At one end of the spectrum is the creationist school that views entrepreneurship as a process of opportunity creation led by teams and individuals (McMullen and Dimov, 2013). At the opposite end of the spectrum, the discovery school defends an objective view of entrepreneurship where opportunities exist independently from the entrepreneurs who race to discover and exploit them (Baron, 2006). Creationist theories tend to dismiss incumbents because they believe entrepreneurs’ visions already take into account what incumbents will do. The discovery perspective tends to view incumbents as competitors in sensing and seizing opportunities.

The Lean Launchpad can be described as a discovery theory because potential entrepreneurs start with a customer segment and then search to identify problems worth solving by talking to (interviewing) early adopters in the customer segment. Potential entrepreneurs develop product and service ideas with respect to validated problems only. Both of these tenets of the Lean Launchpad method are grounded in a belief about reality where problems are real and can be objectively (or inter-subjectively) identified and verified, and solutions to validated problems can be iterated through to come to a profitable product or service via a process of elimination.


Baron, R. A. 2006. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1): 104-119.

Blank, S. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. BookBaby.

McMullen, J. S., and Dimov, D. 2013. Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8): 1481-1512.

Steve Blank discusses the Lean Launchpad:

Related posts

1 comment for this post
  1. Victor Khurumov

    Today lean launchpad is one of the most demanded approaches of start-up creation. A group of Australian authors (Kastelle, King, Verreynne, Kambouris, 2018) analyzed the impact of this methodology on national innovation system evolution.
    In Australia, the Lean launchpad was adopted on a national program level. Starting as a pilot, the lean launchpad method quickly proved its efficiency and was expanded to the entire national innovation system. Authors have withdrawn a few key points from this case study:
    1) Lean launchpad program needs adaptation to the local context
    2) It is crucial to build successful innovation networks
    3) Measuring success tools are a core element of lean launchpad programs
    Thus, the Lean launchpad can be an efficient method to stimulate and develop entrepreneurial initiatives, however, this approach requires adaptation, a certain environment and tools to be successful.

    Kastelle, T., King, S., Verreynne, M-L. and Kambouris, P. (2018) ‘Experiences using a science-based Lean LaunchPad program and its impact on national innovation system evolution’, Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp.356–370.

Leave your comment Required fields are marked *