Effectuation theory of entrepreneurship

What is the effectuation theory of entrepreneurship?

Dr. Saras Sarasvathy is an Indian business school professor researching strategy, entrepreneurship and business ethics, currently at the University of Virginia.

Sarasvathy proposed the theory of effectuation in the early 2000s after studying a sample of expert entrepreneurs with diverse backgrounds. It is often considered a process theory because it explains the process that entrepreneurs use to create new ventures. Effectuation theory stems from the way that expert entrepreneurs think about problems and how they go about solving them.

Effectuation logic contrasts with what Sarasvathy calls "causation theories" of entrepreneurship, where it is proposed that entrepreneurs start with a goal and then acquire the resources needed to achieve the goal in a linear fashion. Each resource acquisition is a step toward the goal.

In stark contrast, effectuation logic involves evaluating resources that are available to use and then deriving goals out of what can be made from the recombination of those resources. Thus, entrepreneurs don't just recombine resources to meet goals, they accept floating goals within a set of limits and allow the resources that are available now to guide the evolution of their strategies. By forgoing the need for expensive resource like capital, effectuators do in kind deals that achieve their desired effects.

Elaborating on the theory, Sarasvathy suggested that effectuation involves five core principles.

1) A bird in the hand beats two in the bush—This refers to maximizing the use of what an entrepreneur knows (i.e., their background and experience), who they know (e.g., friends, family and others around them), and aligning options based on who they are (i.e., what are the entrepreneur’s abilities).

2) Take on affordable losses—Don't obsess about profit, but do try to minimize potential losses.

3) Make crazy quilts—Weave potential deals with potential partners until something sticks. Many iterations are often required.

4) Make lemonade—See potential in depressed or under-utilized resources.

5) Pilot in the plane—Focus on today, not next year.

Effectuation theory continues to gain research attention from entrepreneurship scholars and has made its way into entrepreneurship textbooks. There is some evidence that expert entrepreneurs use effectuation logic more often than causal logic, providing some support for the theory. One meta-analysis suggests that most of the core effectuation behaviors are positively related to venture performance (Read, Song and Smit, 2009).

As an example, a chef using causal logic decides to cook a particular meal recipe and then gathers the requisite ingredients to do so. A chef using effectuation logic looks in the fridge to see what ingredients are available, then improvises a meal using what is there. Causation logic is rational and may be best employed in situations that do not involve too much uncertainty. By contrast, effectuation logic is useful when there is uncertainty about the goals of the entrepreneur, and therefore, no definable selection environment to analyze (Chandler, DeTienne, McKelvie, and Mumford, 2011).

All entrepreneurship theory categories

Other Process Theories of Entrepreneurship You Should Know:


Sources:

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of management Review, 26(2), 243-263.

Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., and Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of business venturing, 26(3), 375-390.

Read, S., Song, M., and Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573-587.

Comments