Born Global Startups: Skipping the Local Stage

Traditionally, the path to business growth was linear: entrepreneurs focused on domestic markets first, developed skills through trial and error, and only pursued internationalization gradually. This is often known as the "stage model" of growth.

However, a new breed of venture has emerged: the Born Global Startup.

According to Knight and Cavusgil (2004), these are ventures that act globally from their very early stages, utilizing international markets and resources to scale growth immediately.

Why the Shift? Technology and Cost

Modern advances in internet technologies, global talent flows, and international supply chains have substantially lowered the barriers to entry. McCormick & Somaya (2020) argue that entrepreneurs can now bypass home-country constraints, such as government inefficiencies or physical location limitations.

For example, a tax software startup based in the U.S. might decide to ignore the over-saturated American market and immediately target the Australian market. Since interactions are mediated by the internet, the need for physical proximity between the buyer and seller is eliminated.

The Diversity Advantage

Who is most likely to launch a Born Global startup? We expect to see this phenomenon more frequently in smaller countries (where the local market is capped) and among multicultural entrepreneurs.

Bilingualism and exposure to diverse cultures are significant assets. For instance, in Toronto, 1/3 of the population was born outside Canada. Research by Leung & Chiu (2008) and Pidduck (2019) suggests that international experiences—including travel, education, and living abroad—increase "cognitive complexity." This complexity helps founders:

• Understand foreign cultures and consumer behaviors.
• Generate unique cross-border business ideas.
• Leverage established international networks for rapid scaling.

Case Study: Dropshipping

One of the clearest examples of the Born Global model is dropshipping.

In this e-commerce model, the store does not hold inventory. Instead, it purchases items from a third-party supplier (often in a different continent) and facilitates shipment directly to a consumer (in a third continent). This model eliminates warehousing, B2B shipping, and storefront costs, enabling a solo entrepreneur to have a global reach from day one.

Future Research Directions

Scholars are currently looking at "moderators" of this tendency. For example, how do factors like income inequality, the strength of Intellectual Property (IP) rights, or the quality of local institutions determine whether a founder chooses the traditional path or the Born Global path?

1. Born Global Startups and Resource-Based View (RBV)

The success of Born Global Startups challenges the traditional "asset-heavy" assumptions of the Resource-Based View (RBV). While RBV typically focuses on tangible assets like factories or capital as sources of advantage, Born Globals rely on "intangible" resources. Their key assets are the "cognitive complexity" of the founder and their ability to navigate international networks. Thus, for Born Globals, the rare and inimitable resource described in RBV is not physical infrastructure, but the founder's global mindset and cross-cultural adaptability.

2. Born Global Startups and Transaction Cost Theory

Transaction Cost Theory explains why Born Globals are now possible. Historically, the transaction costs of finding and monitoring international partners were prohibitively high for small firms. However, digital platforms have drastically reduced these costs, allowing a solo founder to manage a global supply chain (like dropshipping) without a massive hierarchy. Born Globals exist because technology has lowered the "internal" transaction costs of cross-border trade below the threshold that previously required a multinational corporation's scale.

3. Born Global Startups and Agglomeration Theory

Born Global Startups present a paradox for Agglomeration Theory. While Agglomeration argues that firms cluster to access local knowledge and labor, Born Globals demonstrate that digital connectivity can decouple a venture from its physical location. A tax software startup in the US targeting Australia proves that "virtual agglomerations" or digital platforms can substitute for physical clusters. However, they may still benefit from local clusters for talent (e.g., Silicon Valley engineers) while treating the market as global, creating a hybrid model.

4. Born Global Startups and Effectuation Theory

The rapid internationalization of Born Global Startups aligns with the principles of Effectuation Theory. Rather than engaging in the long, "causal" planning of traditional export models (market research -> gradual entry), Born Global founders often "co-create" their markets through immediate action. They use their "Bird in Hand"—such as being bilingual or having a contact abroad—to make an immediate global sale. This effectual approach allows them to skip the domestic "stage" entirely and leverage their personal network as a global launchpad.

5. Born Global Startups and Cultural Theory

Born Global Startups offer a modern counter-narrative to Cultural Theory, which emphasizes the barriers of "psychic distance" between nations. Traditional theory suggests firms trade first with culturally similar countries to reduce risk. Born Globals, often led by "multicultural" entrepreneurs, treat cultural differences not as barriers but as arbitrage opportunities. The "cognitive complexity" of these founders allows them to decode and bridge cultural gaps instantly, turning the "liability of foreignness" into an asset for innovation.

 

Video: What is a Born Global Firm?

---

References