Knight’s Uncertainty-Bearing Theory: Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit

In the Roaring 20s, the world was changing fast. New technologies were booming, and the media idealized business tycoons as daring heroes. Amidst this backdrop of laissez-faire capitalism, Frank Hyneman Knight, an economist at the University of Chicago, developed a theory to explain exactly what these entrepreneurs were doing to deserve their wealth.

His answer? They were bearing Uncertainty.

The "Knightian" Distinction: Risk vs. Uncertainty

Knight’s most enduring contribution (1921) is the distinction between two types of unknowns. While often used interchangeably in conversation, in economics, they are opposites:

• Risk (Insurable): Situations where the outcome is unknown, but the probability distribution is known.
  Example: Rolling dice or actuarial tables for life insurance. You can model this mathematically and hedge against it.
• Uncertainty (Uninsurable): Situations where the probabilities are completely unknowable.
  Example: Launching a totally new product in a new market, or acquiring a competitor. You cannot calculate the odds because it has never happened before.

Profit is the Reward for Uncertainty

According to the theory, Profit is not a wage for work; it is the reward for bearing uninsurable uncertainty.

If a business risk can be calculated (e.g., fire or theft), you can buy insurance for it. It becomes a fixed cost. However, you cannot buy insurance for a failed strategy. Therefore, the entrepreneur who is willing to take on this "Great Unknown" deserves the windfall profits on the rare occasions they succeed.

Knight argued that this capacity is tied to personality. The greater an entrepreneur's Hubris Theory (or Self-Confidence), the more uncertainty they can tolerate.

Mitigating the Unknown

While uncertainty is the source of profit, it is also a source of stress. Knight observed two ways entrepreneurs handle this burden:

1. Pooling

Uncertainty can be reduced by pooling it among several entrepreneurs (e.g., partnerships or corporations). This is especially important when pursuing massive "windfall" profits, as the potential reward is large enough to compensate multiple participants for the shared stress.

2. Institutions

Knight observed that humans developed financial firms and legal structures specifically to eliminate the uncertainty of entrepreneurship (Emmett, 2011). Stable institutions (contracts, banks, regulations) help convert Uncertainty into Risk, creating more predictable outcomes and allowing for stable economic growth.

Connections to other theories

Knight’s focus on the unknowable future provides the bedrock for several modern theories of business and behavior:

• Cantillon Theory: Long before Knight, Richard Cantillon was the first to define the entrepreneur as someone who buys at a "certain" price to sell at an "uncertain" one. Knight refined this by explaining why that price is uncertain.
• Sarasvathy’s Effectuation Theory: Effectuation is the practical answer to Knightian Uncertainty. Since the future is uncalculable, entrepreneurs shouldn't try to predict it; instead, they should control it using the resources they currently have.
• Schumpeter’s Theory: While Knight views the entrepreneur as the one who *bears* uncertainty, Schumpeter views them as the one who *creates* it through "Creative Destruction," disrupting stable markets and forcing others to face new uncertainties.
• Ambiguity Tolerance Theory: This psychological framework measures an individual's comfort level with the very "Knightian Uncertainty" defined here. High tolerance is often the primary predictor of entrepreneurial entry.
• Institutional Theory: Knight’s belief that firms exist to reduce uncertainty is a precursor to Institutional Theory, which examines how societal "rules of the game" (laws, norms) stabilize the entrepreneurial environment.

References