Genetic Theory of Entrepreneurship

📉 STATUS: SMALL EFFECT SIZE

The Genetic Theory: Is There an "Entrepreneur Gene"?

Do entrepreneurs get made in the classroom, or are they born that way? The Genetic Approach to Entrepreneurship looks to biological inheritance to explain the tendency for an individual to become a founder.

Research on genetic links is spurred by considerable anecdotal evidence that the children of entrepreneurs are significantly more likely to become entrepreneurs than the children of non-entrepreneurs. But is this due to their DNA, or simply growing up in a business household?

The Evidence: Twin Studies

To separate biology (Nature) from upbringing (Nurture), researchers turn to Twin Studies.

Nicolaou et al. (2008) conducted a landmark study comparing identical twins (who share 100% of their genes) with fraternal twins (who share 50%). They concluded that when one identical twin becomes an entrepreneur, the other is significantly more likely to do so, even when controlling for family upbringing.

This suggests a heritable component. The researchers initially suggested that **testosterone levels** (linked to risk-taking) might be the inherited factor driving this decision.

The Mechanism: Personality Traits

Later studies added depth to the analysis by looking at what exactly is being inherited. It isn't a "business gene," but rather specific personality traits that make business easier.

Shane et al. (2010) utilized the Big Five Personality Model to explain the link. They found that two specific, heritable traits were strongly associated with entrepreneurial entry:

  • Openness to Experience: The desire for novelty and variety.
  • Extroversion: The tendency to be outgoing and energetic.

The Verdict: Nature vs. Nurture

Genetic theories remain controversial because they seem to downplay the potential for education to spur individuals toward success.

However, the data offers a balanced view. While the study found a genetic link, the effect sizes were small. This suggests that while nature matters (providing a "head start" via personality), nurture (education, experience, and environment) matters much more.

To date, no studies have demonstrated a genetic effect on success—only on the tendency to start. You might be born with the urge to build, but you must learn the skills to win. 



Related Theories

While nature may provide a "head start" via heritable traits, these frameworks explore how those biological tendencies interact with environment and experience:

1. The Biological Mindset

2. The Household & Nurture

3. Environmental Triggers

References

Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., Hunkin, J., & Spector, T. D. (2008). Is the tendency to engage in entrepreneurship genetic? Management Science, 54(1), 167-179.

Shane, S., Nicolaou, N., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. D. (2010). Genetics, the Big Five, and the tendency to be self-employed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1154.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I basically agreed with the author that genetic effect does play a role on entrepreneurial success, especially the traits on openness to experience and extroversion. However, family upbringing, education, personal interests and experiences play a larger role in determining a person's entrepreneurial success. I personally think that if a person possesses both genetically inherited talents in entrepreneurship coupled with subsequent nurturing, it will make him/her more of a success in entrepreneurship.
Chochi23 said…
I find it hard to believe that Genetics could play such a large role in whether a person would have tenancies toward entrepreneurship. I would like to believe that a person, regardless of genetics could be a successful entrepreneur however, I do see that certain qualities could be affected by genetic background. Certainly an interesting topic. I would be interested in seeing further study results!
Unknown said…
i'll agree with this to a certain level the only correlation that is feasible is the parental ties if one of the parents is an entrepreneur the chance that it will rub on the children is 70% according to me but between twins its not explanable to an extent .....like i dont think the fact that they are twins means that they have to head in the same direction