Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Entrepreneurship

Do entrepreneurs exhibit dynamic capabilities? The short answer is: they must if they want to survive.

At the core of Dynamic Capabilities Theory is a simple but brutal truth: an organization's current resources, which may be perfect for today, will likely be irrelevant tomorrow. Recognizing that technologies, policies, and consumer tastes are in a state of constant flux, an organization needs the ability to adapt.

What are Dynamic Capabilities?

According to David Teece (2007):

"The competitive advantage of firms stems from dynamic capabilities rooted in high performance routines operating inside the firm, embedded in the firm’s processes, and conditioned by its history."

In simpler terms, while "ordinary capabilities" help you do things right (efficiency), "dynamic capabilities" help you do the right things (adaptation). This involves a continuous cycle of sensing new opportunities and transforming the organization to seize them.

Responding to Disruption

How do firms respond effectively to converging industries or disruptive innovation? Leaders must shift emphasis between their "core business" (what pays the bills now) and "foothold initiatives" (what will pay the bills in the future).

Exploration vs. Exploitation

Zahra et al. (2006) propose that entrepreneurial companies must "create, define, discover, and exploit opportunities." This creates a tension known as the Exploration/Exploitation Dilemma.

Exploration involves placing "cheap bets" early on to get a foothold in potentially valuable future markets. Most of these bets will fail, but a few will provide massive wins. When a win is identified, the firm generally has three options:

1. License: Sell the innovation to another firm with better-suited competencies to handle it.
2. Exploit: Develop the opportunity internally as a new business unit.
3. Hold: Do nothing and wait for the market to mature.

A true dynamic capability is the ability to shift from exploiting a self-reinforcing resource bundle that is becoming obsolete to a new one that is less tested but represents the future.

Contextualizing Dynamic Capabilities: Scale, Age, and Global Reach

Dynamic capabilities do not function identically across all types of ventures:

• Firm Age and Size Constraints (SMEs): As Arend (2014) points out, developing and enhancing dynamic capabilities is not universally beneficial for every venture. In young and small enterprises (SMEs), the substantial investment and organizational costs of building complex capability-enhancement routines can sometimes outweigh the direct performance gains. Younger and smaller firms must carefully align capability investments with their life-cycle stage.
• International Entrepreneurship: Expanding into foreign markets adds another layer of complexity. Pitelis et al. (2025) demonstrate that dynamic capabilities and international entrepreneurship are deeply interrelated. Entering uncertain cross-border environments demands robust sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring routines, while global exposure simultaneously feeds back to enhance the venture's overall dynamic capabilities.

Critique of the Resource-Based View (RBV)

Dynamic capability theory is often used to critique the Resource-Based View (RBV).

Traditional RBV suggests that competitive advantage comes from hoarding valuable, rare resources. However, in high-velocity markets, hoarding static resources is a death sentence. The prescription of RBV—to leverage competencies within a definable core business—fails when the definition of "core business" changes overnight.

Eisenhardt and Martin (2000) summarize this critique perfectly:

"At the level of RBV, we conclude that traditional RBV misidentifies the locus of long‐term competitive advantage in dynamic markets, overemphasizes the strategic logic of leverage, and reaches a boundary condition in high‐velocity markets."

Core Framework: Teece's Microfoundations

Netflix: Continuous Realignment of the Resource Bundle

Netflix is the textbook corporate manifestation of David Teece's three-step dynamic capabilities framework: Sensing, Seizing, and Transforming. In the early 2000s, Netflix operated an exceptionally efficient "ordinary capability" via its physical mail-order DVD distribution infrastructure. However, instead of protecting this static resource, Reed Hastings proactively sensed the inevitable technological convergence of broadband internet and consumer video compression.

By 2007, the company aggressively seized this inflection point by launching its digital streaming platform. Then came the ultimate architectural transformation: when streaming licensed content became a commoditized market, Netflix altered its historical routines yet again, building an internal, data-driven studio to produce original content (Netflix Originals). By systematically abandoning obsolete resource configurations that paid the immediate bills to risk capital on untested future footholds, Netflix avoided the operational decay that destroyed its static competitors.

Video: Teece on Dynamic Capabilities

---

References

Arend, R. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 33-57.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.

Pitelis, C., Wang, C. L., Hughes, M., & Ambrosini, V. (2025). Towards a better understanding of the interrelationship between dynamic capabilities and international Entrepreneurship. International Business Review, 34(2), 102387.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.

---

Related Theories

Stability is a myth in high-velocity markets. These frameworks explore the mechanics of adaptation, the tension of exploration, and the strategic tools used to transform organizational routines:

1. Adaptive Routines

• Ambidexterity: Mastering the dual challenge of exploiting current gains while exploring future footholds.
• Entropy Theory: Using transformation as a tool to fight off organizational stagnation and decay.

2. Strategic Evolution

• Real Options: Placing "cheap bets" to sense market direction without risking the entire venture.
• Resourse Based Theory: This theory is a punching bag for dynamic capability theory.